rileyuk.co.uk

Yes - also for the sake of my reputation !! Rob's family got the wrong end of the stick at his and Hazel's wedding on Saturday, and seem to think that Mike has posted pictures of my boobs on the internet thanks to this thread and my darling sister !!

Which I would like to point out that he hasn't !!!

mr_e wrote:If you were genuinely affected that badly by it, you're lucky I didn't post what I was going to...want to hear it anyways?

I know that I will regret this. But.......... seing as Mike was desperate for me not to hear.................. please.

Lizzie wrote:Yes - also for the sake of my reputation !! Rob's family got the wrong end of the stick at his and Hazel's wedding on Saturday, and seem to think that Mike has posted pictures of my boobs on the internet thanks to this thread and my darling sister !!

Oh classic! That is hilarious! Michael Riley I salute you as a god among men! That is brilliant! I wish I had been there to see you try and get out of that one.

Just out of interest, did you get any seedy relatives buying you a pint and then asking you where you had posted them?

Andy wrote:

mr_e wrote:If you were genuinely affected that badly by it, you're lucky I didn't post what I was going to...want to hear it anyways?

I know that I will regret this. But.......... seing as Mike was desperate for me not to hear.................. please.

The moment has now passed, and I really do think it would traumatise Lizzie. It was very slightly homo-erotic (No!! But I can do creative writing). Get me drunk and make me post and you might be in "luck".

Loons!

No photos were requested - thank goodness !!!

Could be worse though, at least my parents don't know about my assets being discussed on the internet !!

This has to be one of the most absurd threads on this forum to date. Then again.... PDT_011

Let's consider it as a benchmark for future threads, shall we? Onwards and upwards, my pretties! Fly, fly!

This is absurd, completely absurd. If I recall the only requirement to sign up to this forum is a minimum age of 13, is it not?

But then I suppose this is to be expected....meh, like I really care.

TAOWBST wrote:If I recall the only requirement to sign up to this forum is a minimum age of 13, is it not?

I do not, repeat, DO NOT, want this forum to be overrun by a bunch of Chavs wearing fake burberry and Argos jewellery and posting posts that just say

'' yer mam'' or '' you got a problem?'' or ''innit'' or ''am I bothered?'' or ''eu-eu-euuuuuuuuurrrrrr-''

I have enough of that in my working world. Change this immediately please Mike. I want a ''Chav free'' zone please.

Having realised soon after posting the above, I thought that I would post it first.

yer mam
you got a problem?
innit
am I bothered?
eu-euuu-eeeeeuuuuuuuuuuuurrrr

to be said in the styleeee of a chav who has had some cheap diamond white mixed with blackcurrant.

I like pointless threads.

Boverd, face, boverd

Chavs wearing fake burberry

I know you said fake but it just reminded me:

Burberry have stopped producing products, particularly burberry caps, because of the associated stereotype of chavs. Good on them I say, down with chavs!

I have never particularly like Burberry I always thought it looked like a disgusting tartan. However, I must admit I feel sorry for the poor person(s) that worked tireless hours to launch their company to be one of the most famous in the world. I feel sorry for the poor person(s) who had the genius brainwave to make Kate Moss be their ''face'' and make it one of the most popular fashion label/companies in the world. I feel sorry for this person(s) because now, forever and ever, their ''once world class'' product'' will forever be associated with mindless chavs. Imagine how that person(s) must feel. Gutted.

It would be really funny if you were to speak to that person(s) and their reason to be '' d'yer think am bovrd?'' :D

Perhaps I didn't stress this enough Say no to Chavs!

What I do find suprising though is that although a 'Chav' isn't technically a word, nearly everyone knows what it means. I'm sure you have all laughed at 'Chav' stereotypes in comedy programmes, but I bet you wouldn't be so inclined were a 'real Chav' in your presence. More likely you'd just be threatened and or assaulted. Why do we tolerate this sub-culture of Britain?

TAOWBST wrote:Perhaps I didn't stress this enough Say no to Chavs! Why do we tolerate this sub-culture of Britain?

i think such sub-cultures aren't new - in the 1970s mods and rockers used to beat seven shades of shit out of each other for not liking each other's choice of music, and in those days the police would join in the general chaos with unneccessary violence aimed at both sides as well.

as to why we tolerate them, if they only understand violence it seems we have to communicate with them in similar terms which gets us nowhere - you can't beat to death rivals with the olive branch of peace.