rileyuk.co.uk

Posted: **Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:54 am**

Excuse me for a moment, I have to go cancel an order for special custom trousers. My tailor's going to be so annoyed.

Posted: **Sun Dec 17, 2006 2:26 pm**

I'll have to sling those combat pants that i've been saving for the occassion. They were very durable and had good lining. Shame for them to go to waste.

Posted: **Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:14 am**

Fez wrote:if any of you ever attempt to put me down your trousers it could well be the last thing you ever do in this lifetime

Thank you for the warning. I think it was only fair and right to make this a clear as humanly possible. Not that I was considering it you understand. . . .

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:13 pm**

Fez wrote:maybe that's something we should all try - joining random forums and seeing what other lunatics contribute to other sites

i've taken my own advice and joined the forum for a new band called spinerrette, who have risen from the ashes of my old favourite band the distillers. nothing has been released musically yet, but the new site went on line last week and yours truly is now swapping messages with a weird collection of people - even weirder than you lot.

there are of course some normal types there, and then there are the teenaged goth/punks who know hundreds of people but will still tell you they have no friends. still, its reassuring to know that some where out there on the internerd there are some people who seem even more dangerous than john.

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:22 pm**

Me, dangerous? Or are you talking about the "Dangerous" John Riley? That has quite a nice ring to it...

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:18 pm**

Yup. We are scared of you really. . . .

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:42 am**

dangerous john riley - wasn't that a cop show in the 70s?

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:19 am**

The 1970s? My god, I'd hate to have fame that was based in the 1970s, the era so devoid of style.....no, it's 04:19 am, I can't even contemplate such a thing at this hour of the day....

:?

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:57 am**

Why were you up at 4:19am this morning?!

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:44 pm**

being dangerous!

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:45 pm**

No that was his driving after 2 hours sleep!

Posted: **Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:13 pm**

Actually I had four hours sleep. Luxury, sheer luxury! I was up at 4am, left the house at 4:45am. Arrived in Swindon at 8:15am. Left Swindon 5:10pm. Arrived home 8:35pm.

Nice day!

Posted: **Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:02 am**

johnriley1uk wrote:Actually I had four hours sleep. Luxury, sheer luxury! I was up at 4am, left the house at 4:45am. Arrived in Swindon at 8:15am. Left Swindon 5:10pm. Arrived home 8:35pm.

Nice day!

The words ''Swindon'' and ''Nice'' cannot surely fit in the same message! It even defies the laws of sarcasm.

Posted: **Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:44 am**

The idea of having such a long day does not sound 'nice' more painful.

rileyuk.co.uk

how many?!?