Page 5 of 5
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:13 pm
by Andy
it's bollocks for me.
(Obviously, not literally, I don't want a pair wafted in my face, I have my own thanks and no, I am not going to waft them)
Always has been bollocks.
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 4:41 pm
by Fez
Andy wrote: I have my own thanks and no, I am not going to waft them
oh go on, then we'll put it on youtube!
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:11 pm
by Mike
That DISGUSTS me. Or are you saying that his 'tackle' is free. . . .
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:20 pm
by mr_e
They wouldn't even let you put that stuff on YouTube. Even they have some standards. Alternatively, put something similar up, put some misleading tags on it, and see how long it takes for them to delete the clip, your account, and ip ban you. I'd feel sorry for whoever accidentally viewed it...
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:55 pm
by Andy
Erm.... excuse me.... this is
MY bollocks that we are talking about!
I like them. I am comfortable with them.
Anyway, I'm sure it would be a popular thread.
I will not ''waft'' on request though no matter how much fame or adulation I would be missing out on.
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:02 pm
by Andy
mr_e wrote:Alternatively, put something similar up, put some misleading tags on it,
Hang on a minute, these thoughts have just occured to me
1) WTF! This disturbs me greatly that you were thinking of
my privates in this way.
2) ''similar''? What the hell is similar to a pair of gonads swaying on a video. (comments about golf balls need not apply)
3) ''some misleading tags''?
*
Youtube Balls Up
In suburban American young Jimmy got a massive shock when he went on the popular youtube site today looking for a picture of vegetables and got a graphic image of a pair of male testicles wafting over his entire screen.
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:40 pm
by mr_e
I wasn't thinking of yours, just a video similar in content, not even having to involve you. The example you give in point three is broadly what people do to increase views.
Also, stop mentioning them. Enough already!
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 8:22 am
by Mike
Don't get any ideas mr_e we don't need that sort of image on youtube. . . . .
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:10 am
by johnriley1uk
Just in passing someone on another forum goes by the name of bettyswollocks, which sounds very unsavoury. Andy should be glad he has a normal, well fairly normal, name on here....
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 2:56 pm
by Andy
anything else of me that is going to be scrutinised?
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:10 pm
by Mike
Toe nails. . . . ears, nipples. . . . nope I think that covers it.
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:33 pm
by Andy
Mike wrote:Toe nails
I think David Mellor and also Fergie have that covered for YouTube!!!!!
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:56 am
by johnriley1uk
That is not a happy thought, especially at 2am.
:?
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:02 pm
by Andy
Nearly one week on, I am still disgusted by my thoughts that Sunday evening. :?
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:21 pm
by Mike
You are only disgusted by your thoughts on sunday. Damn must do better, :D