Page 1 of 1
sad but true
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:34 pm
by Fez
step aside america, it seems the british public are new contenders for dumbest people on the planet
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/skynews/200802 ... dbed5.html. i am stunned, sadden and frankly incredulous that such a large number, one in four for pity's sake, are so ignorant. i wanted to write some diatribe about this shocking decline of intelligence but quite frankly im going to have to retreat to my room and read great expectations until my nerve comes back. one in four
Re: sad but true
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:33 pm
by johnriley1uk
Reality and fiction are clearly getting confused, aided and abetted by TV.
Has education become so dire or are people just becoming thick?
Re: sad but true
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:44 pm
by mr_e
I want to know where they found those 3,000 people they surveyed. If it was actually a representative sample, then it shows that knowledge of history is no longer deemed relevant (or that people like to take the piss when completing surveys).
Re: sad but true
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:52 am
by Mike
I suppose it always depends on who you survey. Statistic's can show what ever you want really. There was a film called Winston Churchill the Hollywood Years that said he was a fictional character called Ray Bubbles - that is probably where particularly thick people got confused.
Re: sad but true
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:32 pm
by Fez
Mike wrote:Statistic's can show what ever you want really.
oh come on mike 53% of us know that
Re: sad but true
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:19 pm
by mr_e
Mike wrote:There was a film called Winston Churchill the Hollywood Years that said he was a fictional character called Ray Bubbles - that is probably where particularly thick people got confused.
I could understand if they'd surveyed Americans, but dude... surely this stuff is taught in pre-GCSE history? I'm convinced people must be taking the piss with their answers, or it's just a reflection on a society where the events of sixty years ago are no longer relevant.
Re: sad but true
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:23 pm
by johnriley1uk
The thing that annoys me is when statistics are mixed, like in this made-up statement: "53% of customers expressed satisfaction and four out of five extreme satisfactcion." Or meaningless statements like, "Sales were buoyant, increasing by £5000." That might be very good if total sales for a company were only £50,000, but pretty terrible if it were Microsoft!