Manchester spoil sports say Gemma Atkinson needs bigger buns

Post by **Mike** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:22 pm

Do you agree?

Post by **Mike** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:04 pm

I was trying to find the original on line but it seems
to be scarce!

stimpsonslostson · Post by **stimpsonslostson** » Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:12 pm

Mike wrote:I was trying to find the original on line but it seems
to be scarce!

I bet you found that "educational".

Open safari... open google... type Gemma Atkinson buns... click images...

(I hear Kelly Brook had the same issue... at the risk of depriving you of more "research", the appropriate link is here

Post by **Mike** » Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:45 pm

Research. Yes. That is what I was doing. I am amazed the votes were not going up more dramatically than 1 person!

Chrissie · Post by **Chrissie** » Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:26 pm

Was tempted to offer a fourth option, bigger buns because they are mouth wateringly scrumptious and I'm all about the cake...but guessing that's not the point?!! Poster looks good to me...

Lizzie · Post by **Lizzie** » Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:35 pm

I would say the bigger the better- then hopefully it will cover her smug face!!!

mr_e · Post by **mr_e** » Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:12 pm

I favour a moderate position on bun coverage that will ensure cross-party support for this important legislation.

rileyuk.co.uk

Manchester spoil sports say Gemma Atkinson needs bigger buns

Do you agree

Manchester spoil sports say Gemma Atkinson needs bigger buns

Re: Manchester spoil sports say Gemma Atkinson needs bigger buns

Re: Manchester spoil sports say Gemma Atkinson needs bigger buns

Re: Manchester spoil sports say Gemma Atkinson needs bigger buns

Re: Manchester spoil sports say Gemma Atkinson needs bigger buns

Re: Manchester spoil sports say Gemma Atkinson needs bigger buns

Re: Manchester spoil sports say Gemma Atkinson needs bigger buns