Women you should not fancy

Post by **Mike** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:36 pm

Yes you did read the title right. What women are frequently published as attractive people that really are not!

Top of my list has to be Pamela Anderson. Obvious reasons why.
Others include:
Kate Moss, who lets be honest, just looks hungry.
Sophie Dahl. I hate having to add her here because she was lovely before she lost half her body weight.

Erm, Any others?

Fez · Post by **Fez** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:58 pm

jordan - just what the flying fuck does anyone see in this butt-ugly airhead?

jodie marsh - ditto above

kylie minogue - a nice woman sure, but i just don't see what the mass attraction is supposed to be. the adulation seems a bit much for someone who is attractive, yes, but stunning, no.

Lizzie · Post by **Lizzie** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:03 pm

Men should definately not fancy Natasha Kaplinsky - she's a Queen Bitch who stole Brendon Cole of his girlfriend and then dumped him anyway for someone more powerful and rich !!

Plus she's way too smug !!!

mr_e · Post by **mr_e** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:48 pm

Well, the above pretty much cover it. If I start adding to it, it'll just get catty: let's just include women who have no talent, but rely entirely on their looks (and some of them aren't even that attractive) and turning up at parties.

Shame to see Sophie Dahl on there *swoons*, although considering she's about 6ft tall, she is stupidly underweight. She looked better, and healthier, inbetween at about size 12 or 14.

Post by **Mike** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:33 pm

mr_e wrote:Shame to see Sophie Dahl on there *swoons*, although considering she's about 6ft tall, she is stupidly underweight. She looked better, and healthier, inbetween at about size 12 or 14.

I agree she should not really be on the list but until she goes back to her billboard beauty of the Opium advert then it will not happen! I am sooooo tempted to link to that image

I know what you mean about Jordan, wtf was that pink carrage about in her wedding photos? She needs a reality check if she thinks that she is Cinderella!

Chrissie · Post by **Chrissie** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:54 pm

Janet Street Porter....nuff said.

mr_e · Post by **mr_e** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:51 pm

Friends' mothers. And that Osbourne daughter girl.

TAOWBST · Post by **TAOWBST** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:17 pm

The simple answer is to ignore celebrities. What happens to a celebrity if no-one knows or cares who they are? Nothing, because if no-one knows or cares, how can they be a celebrity?

Personally I don't understand this whole culture around celebrities and the sudden fascination with reality tv shows, they all seem to want to be a part of, (namely that "I'm a celebrity...Get me out of here!" but there are others).

Fez · Post by **Fez** » Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:48 pm

just noticed by accident while channel hopping that i'm a wanker... sorry, I'm A Celebrity... is back on the box - no one appears to be as interested this time though. could this be the death of pointless tv?

Post by **Mike** » Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:41 pm

Nope it only hearalds a change to another style of pointless tv! Does anyone really care about Big Brother anymore?

Mark Scollon · Post by **Mark Scollon** » Sat Nov 26, 2005 3:57 pm

It's a shame someone beat me to mentioning Jordan. I really don't get what the fuss is with her. She is quite simply a pair of false breasts on legs with very little personality to back her up. I find it difficult to believe that you actually paid any attention to her wedding photos, Mike. Jessie Wallace (Kat from Eastenders) should also make it on to this list. I don't think her inclusion even warrants an explanation, so I'm not giving one.

Mark Scollon · Post by **Mark Scollon** » Sat Nov 26, 2005 5:47 pm

Sarah Jessica Parker. I've just seen her on tele advertising her new perfume. I don't know if women would want to smell like her, but they should certainly avoid trying to look like her. She looks as though she had her head trapped in a vice at a very early age and never really recovered.

Post by **Mike** » Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:12 pm

Mark Scollon wrote:It's a shame someone beat me to mentioning Jordan. I really don't get what the fuss is with her. She is quite simply a pair of false breasts on legs with very little personality to back her up. I find it difficult to believe that you actually paid any attention to her wedding photos, Mike.

Ben Elton used the same idea in one of his jokes but I can not remember what he linked it too. Jordan is so unlike a woman now that basically she might as well go the whole hog and have breasts created on her stomach or arms.

My paying attention to her wedding photos is more to do with the fact that Lizzie had some photos in a magazine and my opinion was asked for. Before anyone says it, we are not going to have that carrige for our wedding.

Post by **Mike** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:48 am

On this topic, Lizzie was watching a E-Hollywood story thing on sky today. In the programme it was mentioned that Pamela Anderson had her bionic's removed a couple of years ago and dropped out of the publication / acting like a stone.

How gutted must she have been to know that the only reason she was famous was due to two inaminate blobs of silicone. I really felt sorry for her when I was watching it. . . .

Claire · Post by **Claire** » Wed Dec 07, 2005 6:23 pm

totally agree on the SJP post. yes sex and the city is fabulous but that woman would be nothing special without makeup, expensive clothing and coiffuring. and her pefume smells very middle aged; wouldn't buy it.